Category: Politics

Today in Washington

March for Life (NCR)From the March for Life website:

40=55M

Pro-life: the Human Rights Issue of Today

The 40th March for Life

Jeanne Monahan and Patrick Kelly

January 22nd marks the 40th Anniversary of Roe v. Wade, and on the 25th we will commemorate that solemn occasion with the 40th anniversary of the largest human rights demonstration in the world, the MARCH FOR LIFE.  With the passing of the pro-life leader and visionary Nellie Gray, a change in leadership has occurred, and with this new leadership comes big plans for the March as we go forward.

This year in particular we aim to raise awareness in the minds of all Americans of the 40th Anniversary and the toll this has taken on these United States. Our theme includes an equation–40=55M, to signify that in the forty years since Roe v. Wade, 55 million of our fellow human beings have lost their lives to abortion. Fifty-five million is nearly the population of California and New York combined.  Clearly, abortion truly is the human rights abuse of today and our theme this year reflects this reality.

Read here.

——

Image: National Catholic Register

Maureen Condic Says: Let Science Shape Politics

At Public Discourse:

“Egginton dismisses what he sees as a disingenuous attempt to use neurobiological data to extend legal personhood to a fetus, because “science does not and should not have the power to absolve individuals and communities of the responsibility to choose.” Yet this argument clashes with historical fact. In the two landmark cases that have determined current abortion policy, Roe v. Wade and Planned Parenthood v. Casey, the courts used scientific knowledge to help determine the state’s interests in protecting the fetus after “viability.” If this knowledge has informed current policy, how can it legitimately be excluded as a basis for revising this policy in light of new scientific evidence?”

Read here.

 

 

Senators and Science…

… asked a scientifically-based question, Senator Marco Rubio’s hedged answer drew criticism that he was rejecting clear science for political purposes. “I’m not a scientist. I don’t think I’m qualified to answer a question like that,” the Senator said, and added, “I think that whether you’re looking at it from a theological perspective or a scientific perspective, answering that question with any specificity is above my pay grade.”

Or maybe I’m mistaking him with another United States Senator…

 

 

Stem Cell Debates

What Can We Learn from the Stem Cell Debates?” asks Brendan Foht at Public Discourse, writing about a new report from The Witherspoon Council which argues that “that even the noblest aspirations of the scientific enterprise must be guided by ethics and governed under political authority.”

Shake Down the Thunder…

A couple of months ago, I participated with others in an alumni-led effort to call out our alma mater for its lack of a strong stance in the midst of recent efforts by the government to compel Catholic institutions to participate in actions which contradict moral law. Given that my exhortation to Fr. Jenkins was public, I want to take this opportunity to equally publicly express my gratitude to Fr. Jenkins and the University of Notre Dame for uniting with other Catholic institutions in an effort to protect the vibrant exercise of Catholic religion and social action in the nation. I continue to pray that the University will strengthen her stance and adopt a position of principled and charitable leadership in the American Catholic community, especially in a time when the free practice of Catholic moral life, principled education, and charitable enterprise is under threat from the secularist ideology of the temporal powers that be.

Roe v. Wade and Biotechnology

“Thirty-nine years ago, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled, in Roe v. Wade, that the laws outlawing abortion in Texas were unconstitutional because a woman had a right to privacy, guaranteed by the Constitution.  Suddenly, the unborn had no legal protection in the United States.  But Roe v. Wade did not just deny legal protection to the unborn, it catapulted the United States toward all manner of unethical biotechnology.”

Read at Mary Meets Dolly.

Bishops Respond to HHS Mandate Decision

First, Pope Benedict warned US Catholics and their bishops that our country was facing a “grave threat” to religious liberty:

Pope Benedict said that over the past few days many of the bishops have expressed concern over attempts in the U.S. to “deny the right of conscientious objection on the part of Catholic individuals and institutions with regard to cooperation in intrinsically evil practices.”

Meanwhile, other bishops raised the “worrying tendency to reduce religious freedom to mere freedom of worship” without guarantees of respect for freedom of conscience.

At present, the Obama administration is considering imposing a contraception and sterilization mandate that would require all insurance companies to provide those services free of charge. The regulation has a religious-exemption clause, but it provides very few exceptions for Church organizations.

The next day, Secretary of Health and Human Services Kathleen Sebelius (a Catholic herself) proved him right. The HHS has announced today that, despite considering vociferous objections from religious groups, new rules which will require religious organizations to provide funding for contraceptive services, in violation of their consciences, will remain in place. The bishops respond:

The Catholic bishops of the United States called “literally unconscionable” a decision by the Obama Administration to continue to demand that sterilization, abortifacients and contraception be included in virtually all health plans. Today’s announcement means that this mandate and its very narrow exemption will not change at all; instead there will only be a delay in enforcement against some employers.

“In effect, the president is saying we have a year to figure out how to violate our consciences,” said Cardinal-designate Timothy M. Dolan, archbishop of New York and president of the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops.

The cardinal-designate continued, “To force American citizens to choose between violating their consciences and forgoing their healthcare is literally unconscionable.It is as much an attack on access to health care as on religious freedom. Historically this represents a challenge and a compromise of our religious liberty.”

The HHS rule requires that sterilization and contraception – including controversial abortifacients – be included among “preventive services” coverage in almost every healthcare plan available to Americans. “The government should not force Americans to act as if pregnancy is a disease to be prevented at all costs,” added Cardinal-designate Dolan.

At issue, the U.S. bishops and other religious leaders insist, is the survival of a cornerstone constitutionally protected freedom that ensures respect for the conscience of Catholics and all other Americans.

The USCCB report is here.

More Notre Dame News

More news from Notre Dame … Fr. Jenkins, president of the university, has written an open letter to Secretary of Health and Human Services Kathleen Sebelius decrying the anti-Catholic regulations set to be enacted for insurance providers:

“Surely you know that we welcome the Administration’s decision to require health plans to cover women’s preventive services, such as critical screenings that will make preventive care more widely available and affordable. However, I’m sure you also understand that the inclusion in that mandate of contraceptive services that the Catholic Church finds morally objectionable makes it imperative that the Final Rule include broader conscience protections. In their current form, these regulations would require us to offer our students sterilization procedures and prescription contraceptives, including pills that act after fertilization to induce abortions, and to offer such services in our employee health plans. This would compel Notre Dame to either pay for contraception and sterilization in violation of the Church’s moral teaching, or to discontinue our employee and student health care plans in violation of the Church’s social teaching. It is an impossible position.”

The Notre Dame Center for Ethics & Culture has more.

To read what the USCCB has to say about these threats to Catholic conscience and to find ways to voice your own concerns, visit here.

Stem Cell News

First, Rebecca Taylor at Mary Meets Dolly explains why Peyton Manning (and others) went overseas for adult-stem cell treatment:

“So why is this autologous stem cell tourism happening?  Many ask why are these treatments not available in the United States?  It is often wrongly suggested that it has to do with Bush’s restrictions on the funding of embryonic stem cell research.  It has absolutely nothing to do with that because these are autologous adult stem cell transplants.  In reality, unlike the United States, most industrialized nations have some kind of legislation that protects embryos from being created and destroyed for research.  The real answer is simple: because of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration or FDA.  The FDA has categorized an autologous stem cell transplant as it would a drug and therefore autologous stem cell transplants must go through the same rigorous phase trials that a new drug would.”

And Nature reports on efforts in Texas to green-light adult stem-cell treatment trials:

“Texas has poured millions of dollars into studying and commercializing adult stem-cell treatments through its Emerging Technology Fund, an initiative created at [Governor Rick] Perry’s behest. Perry sees the treatments as both a potential boon to the Texan economy and an alternative to treatments that use embryonic stem cells, which he opposes. In a 25 July letter, he asked the Texas Medical Board (TMB), which regulates the state’s physicians and is currently reviewing its policy on stem-cell treatments, to take a lenient view on the procedures. “It is my hope that Texas will become the world’s leader in the research and use of adult stem cells,” he wrote. “With the right policies in place, we can lead the nation in advancing adult-stem-cell research that will treat diseases, cure cancers and, ultimately, save lives.”

Although scientists and physicians in Texas are excited about the funding to develop stem-cell science, many are concerned that treatments will reach the clinic before safety and efficacy are properly established. “I do believe governor Perry is pushing research to the clinic too quickly,” says Kirstin Matthews, who researches science and technology policy at Rice University in Houston, and who is a member of the TMB’s stakeholder group, which is helping to draft the board’s stem-cell policy.”

Bishops Urge Conscience Protection, Resist New HHS Mandates

The USCCB reports:

“Congress should support a bill (H.R. 1179, S. 1467) that will close gaps in protection of conscience rights in the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (PPACA), especially in light of the threat to conscience rights posed by a new mandate from the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), said Cardinal Daniel DiNardo of Galveston-Houston in a September 7 letter to Congress.

“I urge you to support and co-sponsor the Respect for Rights of Conscience Act, to help preserve respect in federal law for the freedom to follow the dictates of one’s conscience,” wrote Cardinal DiNardo, chairman of the Committee on Pro-Life Activities of the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops (USCCB).

Cardinal DiNardo noted that passage of the Respect for Rights of Conscience Act is more urgent now that HHS has mandated that all private insurance plans cover contraceptives and sterilization.

The HHS rule has an “incredibly narrow” exemption for religious employers which “protects almost no one,” since organizations that employ or serve people of another religion would not qualify.”

Read here.